Cover
Cover
Cover

Multi Scale Inspection

We present a multi-scale robotic system that finds and precisely measures hairline cracks in concrete. A CNN first detects surface cracks; those regions are back-projected into 3D, then a robotic arm guides a high-resolution laser line scanner to capture crack shape/width. Finally, laser scans are fused with a LiDAR map to build a 3D digital twin of the surrounding structure. The approach is validated in simulation and lab tests and benchmarked against vision-based methods and a transparent crack ruler.

Showcase image
Showcase image
Showcase image
Showcase image
challenge.

Manual inspections are variable and labor-intensive, and full high-resolution coverage of large assets is impractical in time, power, and cost.

  • Pure vision methods struggle to measure crack shape/depth—photogrammetry/stereo are sensitive to texture, lighting, and calibration.

  • Inspectors need a way to prioritize ROIs for fine scanning while maintaining a global context of the structure.

Showcase image
Showcase image
Showcase image
Showcase image
Showcase image
Showcase image
results.

End-to-end pipeline: U-Net crack segmentation runs fast enough for real-time use; ROIs are converted from 2D to 3D for targeted robotic scanning.

  • Micron-level measurement: Experimental protocol produced 12,800 scan slices over 6 cm with ~0.004 mm slice resolution.

  • Hairline cracks quantified: Measured widths 0.02–0.14 mm at different locations; readings checked against a transparent crack ruler.

  • Minimum detectable width: Comparative table shows this method achieves < 0.01 mm, outperforming prior laser-based approaches.

  • Context + detail: Depth cameras alone were not suitable for tiny cracks; LiDAR gives a holistic map while the laser provides precise local geometry—then both are fused.

testimonial.

This system lets us see the whole structure and the hairline details at once. We flag a suspect region, the robot scans it at ~0.004 mm resolution, and the results snap into our 3D map. It’s faster, more consistent, and far more informative than manual crack checks.”

Author image
Ali Ghadimzadeh

Ph.D. Candidate, Mechanical Engineering